On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Nope, the terms of use are already pretty clear. And no one has provided > a compelling reason to keep these projects around, just lots of > suggestions on how to keep them around. Deleted is what we want, not > delisted or saved forever or anything like that. We're not going to > commit any resources to a project that choosed not to use this free > service. Well, because sooner or later, you'll delete a project that someone didn't want deleted, and they'll be ticked off. Maybe they'll open a ticket and convince the infra. team to restore the data from a backup, or maybe they'll just be ticked off and rant about how much Fedora sucks for deleting this thing they didn't want deleted. Again, I'm assuming the per-project maintenence cost is near zero (ie, a little bit of disk space). If not, then maybe I could see a case for automatically deleting old projects. -RN -- Robin Norwood "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
