On Thu, 29 May 2008, Aioanei Rares wrote: > Nigel Jones wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > With Fedora 9 out the door we hit a very busy time for elections, the > > previous system was, well lets just say, not optimal. > > > > So I accepted the goal of creating an application by our post-release > > election season that would integrate well with FAS and would allow a > > different method of voting, Range Voting. > > > > If your not familiar with Range Voting check out > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Range_voting the essentials however is that you > > rank candidates from 0<-># of candidates, if you don't like them, just rank > > them 0. > > > > In the future, the application will not only allow the Board and Steering > > Committees to hold elections, it will (hopefully) become available to SIGs > > and Steering Committees for any time of poll/call to vote. > > > > This is where you all come in, it's impossible for a small group of people > > to find every possible mistake or bug in ANY item of software, so the more > > people we can get in to test it and report bugs/issues/thoughts the better! > > > > All I ask is 10-20 minutes of your time, whenever your free over the couple > > of days to test and provide feedback. > > > > Instructions: > > 1) You'll need an account on the test instance of FAS at > > http://publictest10.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ (PLEASE) do not use your > > normal password and you don't need to do CLA etc (I've removed that > > requirement in the elections app for now). > > 2) Please direct your browser to > > https://publictest10.fedoraproject.org/elections/ and test away! > > 3) Try voting etc, make sure that you *can* view the results at > > https://publictest10.fedoraproject.org/elections/results/fedora but can't > > view the results at > > https://publictest10.fedoraproject.org/elections/results/president > > > > Notes: > > * I'm aware the UI is absolutely awful, there is already a ticket open for > > this (https://fedorahosted.org/elections/ticket/4) please feel free to add > > items there. > > * Any errors you encounter that are 'unexpected' to you, please file a > > ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/elections/newticket setting Milestone to > > 'Release 0.1.0' with full reproduction steps, and the time it occurred > > (TZ=UTC date) > > * Any other feedback can be directed to the elections-devel list > > (elections-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) > > > > After 5am UTC on the 1st June both elections will end and the 'results' > > should be public and hopefully we'll have a decent election app! > > > > Thanks a lot & Happy Testing, > > > > Nigel Jones > > > > p.s. Sorry to those that fall asleep during my e-mail - I nearly did too! > > p.s.s. Thanks must be given to Toshio, Ricky, Luca and Mike who have all > > assisted in this release > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list > > Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list > > > Secure Connection Failed > > > > > > publictest10.fedoraproject.org uses an invalid security certificate. > > The certificate is not trusted because it is self signed. > > (Error code: sec_error_untrusted_issuer) > > > > > > * This could be a problem with the server's configuration, or it could be > someone trying to impersonate the server. > > * If you have connected to this server successfully in the past, the error > may be temporary, and you can try again later. > > This is what i get.... > its a self signed cert. You'll have to configure our browser to accept it. -Mike _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
