On Sat, 24 May 2008, Mike McGrath wrote: > On Sun, 25 May 2008, Yaakov Nemoy wrote: > > > On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Eugene Teo <eteo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote: > > >> With the new process for getting (and staying) on Planet Fedora in > > >> place, how does it affect GSoC-ers ? > > >> > > >> Do we have their blogs on the Planet ? And, do they get FedoraPeople.org > > >> accounts ? > > > > > > Is it possible to waive the requirement that my mentee has to be > > > sponsored to a group other than the CLA group? I remember there were > > > discussion about syndicating our mentees blogs to Planet Fedora? > > > > I'm going to forward this to seth vidal, who is in charge of such > > things, and the Fedora Infrastructure team. > > > > Personally I think that the students/mentees will need access to the > > wiki at some point or another. That can definitely count as a second > > group. I've made it a point for my mentee to have a biography on the > > wiki, and with the new wiki, it has it's own group in FAS. > > > > To actually put a blog on Planet Fedora, the mentees need to follow > > the instructions seth posted a few days ago. > > > > They can be found here > > http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2008/05/19/changes-at-planet-fedora/ > > > > My personal feeling is that individuals that want to be on planet really > should be a fedora contributor. The barriers are pretty low (and going > down even more all the time) to contribute. > > The question then is, why would someone want to be on Fedora planet but > not be a fedora contributor? > Alternatively, perhaps we should just have an GSoC group? These guys are technically contributors... -Mike _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
