On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Tuesday 29 April 2008, Mike McGrath wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > Mike McGrath (mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > > > Assuming we're not going to run out of space once we have 2/3/4 > > > > > secondary arches, +1. > > > > > > > > Actually I have no space requirements for anything other then ia64 > > > > right now so I cannot say whether we will or won't run out of space for > > > > the other arches. > > > > > > Do we want to spec out for this build (ia64 requirements) x 3? Do we > > > have that sort of space available? > > > > Not sure if we do or not. Dennis, is ia64 the benchmark for secondary > > archs? Can we just multiply it * 3? Also what are the updates > > requirements / release for these archs? > +1 from me > > as far as requirements sparc/sparc64 will be ~ same as ppc/ppc64 ia64, > alpha, arm should be close to i386 s390 im not sure but im guessing > similar to sparc unless they only build for s390x and drop support for s390 > > though alpha, arm, and s390 lag behind sparc which is behind ia64. > So the actual number we should be using to reserve space for an arch for a release is..? I really really really need someone to find that number and commit to it and its essential that the number be correct. We have done a horrid job of guessing how much space we need for things and its caused a lot of needless headaches. It's not easy to guess how much space we need. There's a lot of parts involved, especially when you start talking about isos and updates. So lets not guess. Lets do some research and get that number. -Mike _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
