On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > There's two options: spin a new package based off the actual > python-fedora-0.2.99.8. The diff for that would look like > bzr-0.2.99.8-current.patch. > > The alternative is to only fix the problem that we know we're having with > BaseClient. The patch for that is quite a bit smaller: it's just a few lines > to change exception handling in fas2.py and jsonfasprovider.py to use the new > exception hierarchy in BaseClient. > > Risk for option #1: we have had the new python-fedora deployed since Friday > and this is the only problem reported so far. The patch is bigger than for > option #2 and thus there's more room for unexpected problems. > > Risk for option #2: We definitely do not want to push this package out to the > other servers as it's likely to break error handling in clients because of the > new exception hierarchy. Since we're in change freeze we're not likely to do > that for a while. > > I'm inclined for option #2. What do others think? > +1 to #2 -Mike _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
