Re: sub-optimal torrent for F9 Snapshot 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 29 Mar 2008, John Poelstra wrote:

> I'm finding trying to get Friday's snapshot of Fedora 9 to be very
> sub-optimal... 62 hours estimated to go after already timing out once. I've
> got two peers and one seed :(  I'll probably get it by time the next snapshot
> is ready :)
>
> Is this happening to others?
>
> Is this really a viable way to put out *weekly* snapshots?
>
> Is hosting jigdo templates a possibility?  In my situation it would work well
> because I mirror the rawhide trees locally--yes I realize this begs the
> question of why I need the snapshot if I already mirror rawhide, but I'm
> curious if it fails to install for me just as rawhide has for the past three
> days.

Looks like this is actually releng's call as they decided to host jigdo
for the last beta.  I'm not sure if we ever got it actually working right
though.

	-Mike

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux