Paulo Santos said the following on 12/13/2007 01:15 AM Pacific Time:
I tend to agree with stahnma. Currently we already offer the most common
SCMs, and from what i can see no one has really good knowledge with
monotone, which may be a problem regarding some future
troubleshooting/administration/whatever.
If we still think that monotone, would be a good addition though, we
could always send some emails and see what would be the acceptance of it
and the number of projects to be created.
For now i would say no to monotone, since we don't have the in-house
expertise, and any relevant data on how many projects would be actually
using it.
Paulo
Can someone put forth a strong argument as to why monotone provides
better functionality than the existing 4 choices? Otherwise I think we
have done our due diligence by providing freedom to projects *choose* a
SCM from the supported list which includes most of the currently
widely used SCMs.
Having too many choices isn't always a good thing. One of many links I
found on google: http://www.apa.org/monitor/jun04/toomany.html
John
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
