On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 13:39 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: > > Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> tried this, its not an easy task. But adding an additional SCM for > >> GIT which is JUST a copy of what's in CVS sounds like a waste of our > >> resources. Why not also do SVN, BZR and Mercurial? > >> > > > > IMHO, they're not as useful. > > > > > > And thats the real trick, I'd imagine the mercurial, svn and bzr guys > would disagree with you. > > > If Fedora doesn't want to do this, I can probably set up > > something independent and provide public git:// access. > > > > If someone else wants to host it I'm all for it, we can certainly make > it easier to get at the raw CVS repo. If the other officers disagree > please let it be known, but this sounds more like a distraction/one off > then something that adds value to our infrastructure. > I concur. -sv _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
