Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This sounds like something we could do, but I don't think we should do > it. For one, after we move the hosted stuff away from cvs-int, that > box will get a complete makover and one that, as far as I can tell, > won't include git. I'm not sure what problem this solves really. > > If there is a real need in Fedora to use git, why not just put > together a proposal for migrating cvs to git? Lots of people have Hi Mike, That's a much bigger shift, and will probably take a long time to realize. On the other hand, providing a service like this is easy, and might help nay-sayers realize the value. In the mean time, people who find it useful get the benefit right away. > tried this, its not an easy task. But adding an additional SCM for > GIT which is JUST a copy of what's in CVS sounds like a waste of our > resources. Why not also do SVN, BZR and Mercurial? IMHO, they're not as useful. If Fedora doesn't want to do this, I can probably set up something independent and provide public git:// access. _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
