On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 14:59 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Mike McGrath wrote: > > Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > >>> 8) Move hosted out of PHX and on to new server beach systems. This > >>> will likely include creating a new "hosted" group. > >>> > >> Are we going to consider anything in the git/bzr/hg/svn repositories > >> to be hosted for this purpose? A few things in there pre-date tthe > >> existence of hosted. > > > > > > Not sure, I'd like to build a clearly defined list of what we provide as > > part of "hosted". We can grandfather in whats there I suppose if we > > can't come to an agreement. What projects specifically are you > > wondering about? > > > I wonder mostly because I want to figure out if we'll be hosting one > git/hg repo after the hosted split-off or two. The things in git and hg > but not in a hosted repo are: I'd really prefer to only have to host one machine running services per SCM if at all possible. And there's no reason it shouldn't be. Jeremy _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
