On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 00:49 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > Option 1: Continue to work with Moin > ... > Disadvantages: > - Upstream seems uncooperative Sorry, I worded my email poorly; I meant to go back over that part and make sure I wasn't unintentionally maligning the Moin Moin project. They're very cooperative, afaic, but they have resources with specific skills and interests. Just because we want to shoe-horn in better DocBook support and man page editing features doesn't mean they *should* accept it. My point is that Fedora Project could find a way to step-up more with contributing to the Moin Project, as part of the method of getting our changes accepted (and knowing when and where to run beta versions, how to keep our one-off changes in sync with the tree, etc.) MediaWiki has Wikipedia as a main constituent user that drives some features, right? Who does that for Moin? Could that be fedoraproject.org/wiki? Or are we really not that big of an install/userbase? - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
