On 07/02/2007 04:13 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: > starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left > with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the > people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in > Infrastructure are really pretty simple, so at a glance. What do you > guys think? > > > git: > > mercurial: I have no experience with both. I would say: The one that is faster. Especially with a few thousand dirs (and growing...): [oliver@pils extras.public]$ ls -1 | wc -l 4660 Is there a performance comparison? And which upstream team is more willing to help us? -of
