On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 15:31 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > :) I think this thread took a spin away from the Infrastructure SCM > and on to something else. <pedant> Well, actually, you know, I was specifically, yes, hmm, on target, hmm? > Karsten Wade wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 16:01 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > > > >> I'd really like there to be offline support in a manner that allows > >> non-commiters to be able to clone, modify, and provide a repo back to us that > >> we can pull from. > >> > > > > +1 > > > > I think the barrier described earlier is worse than we realize. It may > > seem like delving into technical details, but actually "centralized v. > > distributed VCS" is actually a strategic question. [Snip reasons why it matters to think about this strategically] My whole point was that it _did_ matter enough to have "distributed VCS" be a specific feature request. Which DVCS wasn't the point. Also, to Blizzard's other points, this is entirely a Band-Aid(tm) in the longer scheme of things. But even when you fall down on your face, as long as you fall in the direction you want to go, you are making progress. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
