On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 00:37 -0500, David Douthitt wrote: > Anand Capur wrote: > > It has the pros/cons of CVS, Subversion, Mercurial, Bazaar-ng, and > > git, also what we need in a system. > I vote for Subversion - just from the standpoint that many people will > know how to use it, and supporting it will be easier and finding people > to support it will be just as easy. Unfortunately, Subversion has two of the flaws that CVS has: 1) Merging is hard. 2) It's requires a centralized model of development that splits people into "committers" and everyone else. Non-committers have a much more difficult time contributing. Using a distributed SCM makes it much easier for people without write access to the main repository to contribute. Jeff
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
