But for now Glezos requests that publictest4 be upgraded to F7, since he needs some packages that exist in F7 and not in FC6.
Thanks,
Paulo
On 6/7/07, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 11:53 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thursday 07 June 2007 11:49:57 Mike McGrath wrote:
> > I agree, I had no plans on upgrading any of our RHEL boxes (except for
> > cvs and db1 but will stay in the RHEL upgrade path). For those of you
> > that are new on the list we've had a lot of discussions about this in
> > the past. Our team, for the most part, agrees that its about picking
> > the right tool for the job. For boxes that don't need brand new
> > technologies (like cvs) its nice to be able to set them up and forget
> > about them. But for some boxes that do need the latest and greatest
> > (like our builders) we've always had and kept them on Fedora.
>
> With RHEL5 out, I question the need for Fedora on the builders. In fact,
> before the merge, all the internal Core builders were running RHEL4. Can we
> not use RHEL5 on the builders now?
>
Will we want to pull in new features for the builders? Something like a
change in rpm is needed for a new version of mock. We want that change
and so we need to upgrade?
I just want to avoid flip-flopping between RHEL and Fedora.
-Toshio
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
