Re: Apache tweak

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I guess with the release soo close no one wants to have the date pushed back due
to users unable to get to the source. However, we are guaranteed to
get large volumes of
traffic which might knock the web servers offline.

Karsten Wade, I think another reason for leaving it is due to
mod_evasive as Seth said
no all the infrastructure people are familiar with it.

Anyways we will see how the web servers stand on Thursday.

On 27/05/07, Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 17:41 +0100, Damian Myerscough wrote:
> Yea, it would. However mod_easvie is able to detect if users a
> continuously hitting refresh
> to consume bandwidth.

Would it make sense to have a few tricks ready to go?  Untested or
unproven items to pull out in response to what happens.  Sort of like
what Egon Spengler might pull out in Ghostbusters ...

I know, it could be *worse* than whatever happens, but there is a slim
chance we'll survive.

- Karsten

Dr. Egon Spengler: Not necessarily. There's definitely a *very slim*
chance we'll survive.
[pause while they consider this]
Dr. Peter Venkman: [slaps Ray] I love this plan! I'm excited it could
work! LET'S DO IT!
--
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list





--
Regards,
 Damian


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux