I guess with the release soo close no one wants to have the date pushed back due to users unable to get to the source. However, we are guaranteed to get large volumes of traffic which might knock the web servers offline. Karsten Wade, I think another reason for leaving it is due to mod_evasive as Seth said no all the infrastructure people are familiar with it. Anyways we will see how the web servers stand on Thursday. On 27/05/07, Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 17:41 +0100, Damian Myerscough wrote: > Yea, it would. However mod_easvie is able to detect if users a > continuously hitting refresh > to consume bandwidth. Would it make sense to have a few tricks ready to go? Untested or unproven items to pull out in response to what happens. Sort of like what Egon Spengler might pull out in Ghostbusters ... I know, it could be *worse* than whatever happens, but there is a slim chance we'll survive. - Karsten Dr. Egon Spengler: Not necessarily. There's definitely a *very slim* chance we'll survive. [pause while they consider this] Dr. Peter Venkman: [slaps Ray] I love this plan! I'm excited it could work! LET'S DO IT! -- Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
-- Regards, Damian
