Hmmmm, I am not 100% sure when a box goes down. I believe it would
still route the
traffic to the dead box however if you set the --every 1 you wouldn't
notice too much.
It would give us enough time I reckon to get the box back online or we
could just remove
it from the iptables until the box came back up.
On 11/05/07, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Damian Myerscough wrote:
> Hey Mike,
>
> I have seen:
>
> if you want to balance the load to the 3 addresses 10.0.0.5, 10.0.0.6
> and 10.0.0.7, then you can do as follows :
>
> # iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -m nth --counter 7 --every 3
> --packet 0 -j SNAT --to-source 10.0.0.5
> # iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -m nth --counter 7 --every 3
> --packet 1 -j SNAT --to-source 10.0.0.6
> # iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -m nth --counter 7 --every 3
> --packet 2 -j SNAT --to-source 10.0.0.7
>
> Do you have a box that can act as a dedicated balance loader while FC
> 7 is being released
How well does this work when 10.0.0.6 goes down?
-Mike
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
--
Regards,
Damian
