On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:02:20 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:47:20 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:08:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
$ rpm -q python-kid
python-kid-0.9-2.centos4
on buildsys.fedoraproject.org would benefit from an update to
0.9.5 which
includes xml related fixes and makes it possible to create pages
that
don't fail in the w3c validator.
$ rpm -q --whatrequires python-kid
repoview-0.5.1-1.centos4
http://home.arcor.de/ms2002sep/tmp/el4-extras/noarch/python-kid-0.9.5-0.1.el4.noarch.rpm
Source rpms and build requirements here:
http://home.arcor.de/ms2002sep/tmp/el4-extras/
I'm not sure I fully understand what problem this solves. Can you
give me an example?
Sure. It's
http://tinyurl.com/2pc37j
versus
http://tinyurl.com/2wdk5s
The former was created with unmodified software on buildsys.f.o,
while the
latter was created with my modified repoview including an updated
python-kid.
So, what is the formal procedure for requesting a package update on the
buildsys server like described above and getting an official and final
reply?