On Monday 09 April 2007 09:07:16 am Warren Togami wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 09:03 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > >> seth vidal wrote: > >>> I think it's a good plan - we should be willing to keep a couple of > >>> fname.lname aliases for some folks who have already published them/used > >>> them elsewhere. And we should say as much in the warning email. > >>> > >>> but by and large I think killing them will be fine. > >> > >> To be kept by special request only? > > > > yeah. So the warning email would say something like: > > > > > > We're planning on removing the firstname.lastname aliases. If you are > > already using this address and would like to continue to, please contact > > admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and tell us about it. > > yada,yada,yada, blah,blah,blah > > > > -sv > > Umm, didn't we agree upon removal of first.last@ addresses many weeks > ago? How is this different now? > > Warren > I thought we had and that it had been announced and implemented. I guess i missed something. -- Dennis Gilmore, RHCE
