On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 14:13 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > I thought we wanted to get people to editing quickly w/o jumping through > all the hoops. Wouldn't that preclude EditGroup addition? You are just a few steps ahead, that is all. I got the lawyer-based permission and guidelines for using a click-through CLA for the Wiki. When that is setup, we can stop using EditGroup for the site-wide ACLs. When ... uh, whenever we get to it. I feel guilty every time I see an addition to EditGroup, but this one is a little lower on the current priorities. Still, what needs to be done is: * Click-through page enabled for new users -- must check "Agree" and then submit the form. * Click-through page is (probably) an Include() of the CLA contents itself -- not very proc intensive to do that, since people only see that page when they create their account. * Confirm that ACLs for special areas (Docs/) are working. Anything else? Other than tell people and celebrate? The dividing line between "click-through is OK" and "need to GPG-sign" is if the user has the ability to put content directly into a content storage system from where it goes into a package (then into an ISO.) So, we can leave Docs/Beats/ open to click-through CLAers because that content is edited before going into CVS (and a package), all done by people who have signed the CLA with a GPG key. This is analogous to patches and such that come in via mailing lists and bugzilla. The special locations such as Docs/ are Wiki-based publishing points, so Docs Project contributor guidelines come into play. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
