On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:02:20 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:47:20 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > > > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:08:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > > > > > >> $ rpm -q python-kid > > >> python-kid-0.9-2.centos4 > > >> > > >> on buildsys.fedoraproject.org would benefit from an update to 0.9.5 which > > >> includes xml related fixes and makes it possible to create pages that > > >> don't fail in the w3c validator. > > >> > > >> $ rpm -q --whatrequires python-kid > > >> repoview-0.5.1-1.centos4 > > >> > > > > > > http://home.arcor.de/ms2002sep/tmp/el4-extras/noarch/python-kid-0.9.5-0.1.el4.noarch.rpm > > > > > > Source rpms and build requirements here: > > > http://home.arcor.de/ms2002sep/tmp/el4-extras/ > > > > > > > I'm not sure I fully understand what problem this solves. Can you give > > me an example? > > Sure. It's > > http://tinyurl.com/2pc37j > > versus > > http://tinyurl.com/2wdk5s > > The former was created with unmodified software on buildsys.f.o, while the > latter was created with my modified repoview including an updated > python-kid. So, what is the formal procedure for requesting a package update on the buildsys server like described above and getting an official and final reply?
