This is somewhat divergent from what Warren was talking about but do we monitor network traffic and/or hardware utilization? I have used MRTG in the past for this type of thing and it was rather handy. -Jason On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 17:31 -0400, Warren Togami wrote: > Just jotting down some ideas for additional Fedora Metrics. Data over > time and graphs would be very useful in media to show using actual > numbers the growth of Fedora in activity, contributors and packages. > These graphs would also be very useful in making business cases to RH in > showing the success of Fedora investment, as we try to justify more > targeted investments. > > Data Sources > ============ > 1) cvsextras-sponsors@xxxxxx receives all of the notices where people > request and are granted access to the cvsextras group. We have no > official mail archive of this. Does anyone personally have an archive > of cvsextras-sponsors mail going back to the beginning when Sopwith > launched the system? > > Harvesting that mail archive would allow us to graph absolute # of > Fedora package contributors over time. This however tells us nothing > about activity. > > 2) Check-in activity on the two commits lists could tell us: > - how many contributors were active in a given month > - how active was package activity in general > - how many new packages > - how many actively maintained packages > > 3) Metadata within CVS could tell us similar information as above. > > Any other ideas for potential statistics grabbing opportunities? > > Warren Togami > wtogami@xxxxxxxxx > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list > Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
