On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 14:40 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > > > Isn't the CLA supposed to contain the Export Compliance statement? I > > had signed the CLA some long time ago, and it still wants the Export > > Compliance statement from me. Or am I mixing apples and oranges? > > > I'm not sure if the CLA covers this (I don't think it does) but I do > know that you don't need a CLA to be a mirror but you do need to sign > the export agreement. Really we're not the right people to answer a > question like that, anyone know how legal questions like this should be > handled? I don't think you need a lawyer here. A read of the CLA makes it clear that it does not cover export control: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Licenses/CLA I've submitted my plain-English CLA to the appropriate legal counsel for approval -- that means this cannot be relied upon yet -- but it is at least close to the mark, and may help in clarifying for ya'll what the CLA is and is not: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KarstenWade/Drafts/PlainEnglishCLA IANAL, TINLA, YMMV, caveat emptor, etcetera. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
