Dennis Gilmore schrieb: > [...] > if a build fails on a > secondary arch then it will not affect the primary arch. I agree with this scheme, but nevertheless one note: In this case it IMHO would be nice to normally(¹) give the secondary arch maintainers a small chance (three to seven days maybe?) to fix packages before the primary arch packages hit the repo to prevent this: day 0: foo-1.0.1-7 in the repos for i386, x86_64, ppc, sparc, ia64 day 1: foo-1.2.0-1 gets submitted to buildsys; fails on sparc and ia64; package gets pushed to the i386, x86_64 repos nearly immediately day 2: foo-1.2.0-2 fixes build on sparc and gets pushed to the i386, x86_64 and sparc repos day 3: foo-1.2.0-3 fixes build on ia64 and gets pushed to the i386, x86_64 sparc and ia64 repos Users of i386 and x86_64 that update daily would have had two package updates without any benefit for them :-( I'd like to aoid that if easily possible. Just my 2 cent. CU thl (¹) -- security updates are for example an exception
