On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 00:48 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 23:21 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> Paulo Santos wrote: > >>> How about talking with Karsten Wade to get all docs in Docs/Draft or > >>> something like Docs/Old... then (at least for the docs part) we could > >>> ditch f.rh.c > >>> > >>> > >>> Paulo > >> I have already done that. The problem there is that there is some PHP > >> code running in fedora.redhat.com backend that helps publishing content. > > > > If no new content is being published to f.r.c then why don't we just > > make the site static and disable all the code altogether? > > f.r.c/docs does get updated now and then. New guides, release notes etc. > Rest of the content can just be redirected. There is no new other > content being added there and we have equivalent or better versions in > fp.o wiki except for /docs. If the site is still being updated then it doesn't make sense to get rid of it, does it. And can someone on the docs team tell us what the fabled php scripts do? It sure doesn't seem like they're doing much b/c it all seems like static content to me. -sv
