I have been looking into the issue has anyone though of: mod_backhand this module could help with load balancing. http://www.backhand.org/mod_backhand/ On 26/10/06, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/26/06, Florian La Roche <laroche@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 08:35:38AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 05:52:23PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > 1. get the websites and docs people to split out a structure in the wiki > > > that is the final release lay out. This will be frozen N days prior to > > > release and static pages will be generated. This static content will be > > > fedoraproject.org/ > > > > I've been looking at this a little. There are moinmoin patches [1] to > > let it work more cleanly with a reverse proxy (the patches proposed > > are used by the Apache Software Foundation). mediawiki has options > > [2] to let non-authenticated users hit static cached pages, cache > > updated when an authenticated user edits a page. I'm still looking > > for same for moinmoin. Together, barring DDOS, that should reduce the > > load significantly. > > > > > > [1] http://moinmoin.wikiwikiweb.de/MoinMoinPatch/CachingProxies > > > > [2] > > $wgUseFileCache = true; > > $wgFileCacheDirectory = "/home/httpd/cache"; > > $wgShowIPinHeader = false; > > $wgUseGzip = false; > > > Is there any reason we should not do the update to > moin 1.5 and then check what additional steps need > to be taken? This would ensure fast upstream integration > and a not too heavily patched local system. > > regards, > > Florian La Roche Its my understanding the web team has some code getting commited back to moin from the SOC. We've just been waiting on them. -Mike _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
