On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 09:25 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > On 10/20/06, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 08:45 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > > > As per our meeting yesterday we have some deadlines coming up and some > > > priorities to meet. We've identified 3 projects which must be done > > > before FC7 ships and one project which would be nice to have done by > > > then. > > > > > > 1) Install and have the devs work with various VCS solutions and pick > > > our future one (even if that is to just stick with CVS). Hopefully > > > we'll be able to eliminate some early runners so we can focus on just > > > a few. We're tracking this information in: > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/VersionControl/ArchitectureDraft > > > > > > 2) Package database: this could be a great tool. Here's the current > > > roadmap: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/PackageDatabase/RoadMap > > > > Stop calling it an rpm database, please. I think that name is fairly > > well reserved for the one on each systems' disk. :) > > > > What are you talking about ;-) > Cute. I'm talking about this: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/private/fedora-infrastructure-list/2006-October/msg00105.html /me loves archives! :) -sv
