Re: [Fedora-infrastructure-list] Re: Infrastructure Officers and team goals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/6/06, Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 12:04:25 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:

> On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 06:22 -0400, Sam Folk-Williams wrote:
>
> > To be consistent with other groups (Docs/Ambassadors, etc) you may want
> > to have people vote for these positions rather than appointing them.
> >
> Not sure about voting.  Ambassadors and FESCo have only started to vote
> on their positions this past year after having a while to create a sense
> of what roles the elected body is supposed to perform.  These positions
> are also different than FESCo and Ambassadors in that it isn't an
> election of a body of people -- it's an election to individual
> positions.  This is the difference between elections for the city
> council and elections for sheriff, treasurer, and mayor.  For these
> specialized positions you want someone who is familiar with the issues
> that will be facing them in that job as they will be the go-to person
> when problems crop up in those areas.
>
> Which isn't to say that voters couldn't do a good job of picking people
> with the right skills and knowledge here either.  But I think we lack
> one other criteria for good elections: voters.  Currently we only have
> 31 people listed in the sysadmin groups so it's somewhat silly to hold
> elections for seven positions at this point.  I think a simple
> confirmation/discussion will better serve us at this time.

Prior to filling positions with people and titles, it would be better to
define the obligations, responsibilities, and the work-flow for each of
these positions.

Like "What exactly does the Build System/Package Manager [X] do? How does he
differ from other contributors within the Infrastructure Group? What
do you--i.e. a contributor or person within the Infrastructure Group--need
him for instead of the list?"   [X] insert other position titles here

Especially for people outside the Infrastructure Group or even outside the
Fedora Project, such information about the structure of parts of the
project is important.


In this instance I was hoping the people involved would help design
the guidelines for their own roles, for approval of course.

           -Mike


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux