On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 15:17 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 17:05 -0500, Tom Lynema wrote: > > Aurelien and I were quite active on creating a schema that would work > > correctly for out needs. It was a good time. We were and still are > > really close to something that appears to be workable. The resulting > > work is at > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/AccountSystem2/Schema (the link appears to be down at the moment). > > > This URL should work: > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/AccountSystem2/Schema > Side note: I think there's something screwy with the way > admin.fedoraproject.org handles pages that are in the wiki.... > I agree with the screwyness comment. Your link worked. > > We were moving onto writing the actual schema out and getting it > > validated by a standards body. About that time, Aurelien moved and > > hasn't talked to me about it in a while. He knew more about LDAP than I > > and was going to perform these tasks. > > > I know nothing about LDAP but -- is there a reason schemas should be > validated by a standards body before being tested and used? > It's has to do with the custom schema. We can obtain a number that will be unique to us so no one can confuse our schema with someone else's. I don't see it as a necessity though. The governing body is http://www.iana.org/ . > > -Toshio > ~tom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
