On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 16:20 -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > > Note that we may not be able to deploy the Coverity bits on the same > build machines that Extras packages are built on right now; I would hope that the infrastructure team would balk on putting any proprietary software on the build systems anyway. That's a sure fire way to cause undiagnosable issues and to prevent moving forward with the OS installs. Also there is the security concern. We don't want un audited bits of software being part of our build process. Sure coverity could say we audited our own software, but still.... Call it the paranoia in me, but I certainly wouldn't want it on my build systems, and I don't think internally at Red Hat we'll (release engineering) be to keen on putting it in OUR build system either. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part