Re: Fwd: [Fedora-infrastructure-list] A cvs space for the Usability Sig

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Damien Durand wrote:


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *Damien Durand* <splinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:splinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: 27 août 2006 12:18
Subject: Re: [Fedora-infrastructure-list] A cvs space for the Usability Sig
To: "Patrick W. Barnes" <nman64@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:nman64@xxxxxxxxx>>

Hi,

"temporary storage" aren't the good words, I'm actually starting an application for "Fedora Usability" called "fusability". It's like bug-buddy but allow to produce usability repports. Yes actually I can host this on a my web access because it's not usable.

Bugzilla allow to conserve patchs or other? I don't think that it's the best solution but now that can be acceptable because the Usability Sigs has an existance of 2 weeks.

The "Usability packages" is a good idea, We can produce "unofficial" packages for testing the application massively...

I'm agree with you, cvs is not essential actually because usability is too young but that can be good for a efficient and productive work. Send the sources by mail etc... is not really great.

If your goal is unofficial side packages for usability, it may be best to wait for the next generation VCS that we hope to deploy before FC7. It will be one of the distributed VCS, which is extremely well suited for these kind of temporary branches. It could be done then with far less ugliness.

Please do the best you can with Bugzilla, Wiki's and 3rd hosted space until then.

Warren Togami
wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux