On Friday 11 August 2006 10:29 pm, seth vidal wrote: > On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 22:02 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > > Backport to python2.3, package python 2.4 in such a way as it is > > parallel installable with 2.3 ( there is to many things linked to the > > version of python that is in a distro to upgrade it to 2.4, or use FC5 > > if this is for the primary bzr server let's not use fc5 for it. We need > to be able to keep it up for a long-ish time. thats my inclination also. it will take more work but porting bzr to python 2.3 or making a parallel installable 2.4 would be best options. Just throwing out there what i see as the possible options, I didint say they were good ideas :D -- Dennis Gilmore, RHCE Proud Australian
