Re: #37: Should we need i18n-sig fas group?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



#37: Should we need i18n-sig fas group?
--------------------+-----------------------
Reporter:  pnemade  |       Owner:  i18n@…
    Type:  meeting  |      Status:  assigned
Priority:  major    |  Resolution:
Keywords:           |  Blocked By:
Blocking:           |
--------------------+-----------------------

Comment (by pravins):

 - i18n-sig looks better than i18n-team.
 - tag i18n packages in tagger
 - fonts-sig idea also looks good. but need to decide on it.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/37#comment:3>
Fedora Internationalization <http://fedorahosted.org/i18n/>
Fedora i18n Project
--
i18n mailing list
i18n@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/i18n





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux