#37: Should we need i18n-sig fas group?
----------------------+-------------------
Reporter: pnemade | Owner: i18n@…
Type: meeting | Status: new
Priority: major | Keywords:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
----------------------+-------------------
= phenomenon =
This is based on
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-October/203114.html
some points to discuss
1) Do we need i18n-sig fas group?
2) What should it be used for? CC'ing on i18n bugs, group commit access on
i18n packages
3) Adding all i18n package maintainers to i18n-sig
4) Should this be kept small? ( I mean no fonts packages added to i18n-
sig) Thus we endup with 162 packages.
As of today https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/i18n-team we
got 263 packages there of which 101 fonts packages.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/37>
Fedora Internationalization <http://fedorahosted.org/i18n/>
Fedora i18n Project
--
i18n mailing list
i18n@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/i18n
