Hello,
मयंक जैन (Mayank Jain) wrote:
On 6/24/06, Ryo Dairiki
<ryo-dairiki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Ryo,
I haven't tested Fedora Core 6-test1,
but there is no
scim-bridge-gtkimm.i386 for x86_64 architectures, isn't there?
Scim-bridge
now supports multilibs so you can use scim-bridge-gtkimm.i386 on them;
It
communicate with scim.x86_64. On the other hand, It doesn't need
scim-libs.i386 at all.
When Fedora is packaged for a particular version, only the rpm's for
that arch are included in the distro.
That's not true, I think. There is scim-libs.i386 in FC5.x86_64. :(
However, scim-bridge-gtkimm
package is available through yum for both i386 & x86_64. Probably
all
you need to do is setup a repo for i386 packages for FC6T1 :-)
I personally have it, as I'm a developer of scim project.
So that's not problem in this case.
Anyway thank you for your concern.
This is useful because there is some
apps only provides i386 binaries.
For example, acroread. I use acroread on x86_64 architecture with
scim-bridge-gtkimm.i386. This is why scim-bridge has been developed.
Whithout it, you have to use fallback xim or origial scim-gtkimm. The
former
kills inline preedits and the latter kills acroread itself! So I insist
that
scim-bridge-gtkimm.i386 should be included in FC6.x86_64.
Is there a bug filed i Red Hat bugzilla for the same?
What do you mean?
You mean I should put this into bugzilla?
Thanks,
Makuchaku
Thanks you too.
Regards,
Ryo Dairiki
|
