On 17 November 2014 15:11, Akira TAGOH <tagoh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+1
----- Original Message -----
| Hi,
|
| On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Rajeesh K Nambiar
| <rajeeshknambiar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| > Hi,
| >
| > I'd like to maintain/co-maintain PT Serif[1] and PT Mono[2] fonts by
| > paratype. Would it be better to include them in the existing PT
| > Sans[3] fonts package - incorporate in the same spec as multiple
| > packages, or as individual specs?
| >
| > Here's the altered spec file[4] and srpm[5] combining all 3 paratype
| > fonts. (Note the hack in %prep phase due to source packages containing
| > same file names). What do you think?
| >
|
| We can solve this by either one of following solution
| 1) Rename this package paratype-pt-sans-fonts to paratype-pt-fonts and
| include all 3 types sans, serif, mono in subpackages.
| OR
| 2) Add individual packages, add new package paratype-pt-serif-fonts
| and paratype-pt-mono-fonts.
If upstream ships the archive for them separately, 2) is the way to go for packaging according to our font packging policy.
+1
Regards,
Pravin Satpute
Pravin Satpute
_______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
