On 09/26/2012 02:36 AM, Daiki Ueno wrote: > Hi, > > To link from my fonts application[1], I've checked wiki pages under: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Packaged_fonts > and found that several pages refer to nonexisting package in pkgdb. > > Here is the list: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIL_Charis_fonts (charis-fonts) > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Asana_Math_fonts (asana-math-fonts) > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIL_Abyssinica_fonts (abyssinica-fonts) > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CJKUni_fonts (cjkunifonts) > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Thai_scalable_fonts (thaifonts-scalable) > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIL_Doulos_fonts (doulos-fonts) > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Apanov_Edrip_fonts (edrip-fonts) I didn't have time to research the above items, but I did the ones below: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OFLB_Goody_Bookletter_1911_fonts (olfb-goody-bookletter-1911-fonts) Pkgdb link fixed. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIL_Andika_fonts (andika-fonts) Renamed, new pkgdb link here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/sil-andika-fonts > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Hartke_Aurulent_fonts (hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts) Orphaned: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwiz_Aleczapka_fonts (artwiz-aleczapka-fonts) Pkgdb link fixed. > It seems that some of them were renamed to comply with the fonts policy > but for others I have no idea. Could the package owners take a look and > update the information? I'm wondering if pkgdb has changed, the wiki "pkgdb:" macro seems to want to use pathing that doesn't work for any packages. ~tom == Fedora Project _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
