Re: font packages list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Well, no policies to complain about it. that would be the sort of RFE in that sense so far. but would be a good idea. let me try.


----- 元のメッセージ -----
| Sorry late reply:
| ----- Original Message -----
| > for f16,
| > We should have certain aliases for Tibetan, Dzongkha and Thai at
| > least. no aliases defined for those languages at all.
| >
| > Aside from that, some fonts packages being sorted out at "other"
| > (and
| > particularly is decorated by non-italic which would be installed by
| > default regardless of languages) may have options to 1) assign any
| > aliases to use it efficiently or 2) get rid of "mandatory" or
| > "default" from comps otherwise.
| How about filing bugs for missing aliases that should be fixed?
| A tracker bug may be good too?
| Jens
fonts mailing list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Font Configuration]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux