Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Hi all, > > I've queued the following small guideline change proposal for FPC > consideration: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_spec_template_correction_(fontconfig) > > Please add comments, reactions and corrections in the wiki. Hi Nicolas, I like the direction of it. The idea of having separate conf.avail and conf.d is that sysadmins can symlink/unlink entries into conf.d to enable/disable configuration for their system. This would only work if upgrading fontconfig/fonts rpms does not reinstate the unlinked symlink. However, last time I checked this was not working correctly. Can you check this first? Thanks, behdad > Regards, _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
