On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 12:59 +0300, Vasile Gaburici wrote: > It looks to me like the GUST fokes did their best, but they're not a > big company, so they ignored some legal aspects. Rather than telling > them they're about to get blacklisted, perhaps a more constructive > approach is in order. When in doubt, ask questions first and relicense later. The correct solution always was just to keep the original license and only change it if every entity that contributed to the work approved. So what if the GUST people do not like the original licence — many fonts have a sucky license (Bistream Vera, Liberation…), and people still abide with the original licensing. (And for the record, I doubt anyone but the GUST people find their license pretty. Legalese referensing other legalese, come on, it's not a perl obfuscation contest) Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
