Re: TeXGyre fonts licensing concern

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 12:59 +0300, Vasile Gaburici wrote:
> As you can see, there is no attempt to missattribute the work. The
> only trouble is that GUST attempted to relicense the work under more
> liberal terms, from GPL to LPPL/GUST. IMHO, the way is to convince URW
> and the two individual contributors (Valek Filippov and Han The Thanh)
> to agree to relicense their work under a license more appropriate for
> fonts. Perhaps Tom can suggest what the best license is.

I won't go so far as to suggest the "best license", however, the
simplest solution would be to convince the contributors to agree to
license their contributions under the GPL (with font exception) as that
would be compatible with URW's original work (thus, we would not be
bottlenecked trying to reach URW).

~spot

_______________________________________________
Fedora-fonts-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Font Configuration]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux