Hi, --- On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Chitlesh GOORAH <chitlesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: | * From a fedora software packaging point of view | | We have to ensure that these cores can either be compiled with | iverilog or ghdl. A script or Makefile should be shipped with the rpm. \-- Yes, we will ship only those that work with FEL tools. --- | All proprietary scripts should be in docdir of a subpackage -extra. \-- We shouldn't ship proprietary scripts that don't have the sources or are not under a free/open software/hardware license. --- | The advantage of packaging these cores is that once we got one core | fully packaged, others will have the same template and it will be very | smooth. \-- Agreed. --- | We should only compile those cores which are tagged as done/complete. | Those cores without documentation are pretty useless for the user. So | I would say we should prioritize those having documentation. \-- Ok. Could you point me to where I can find documentation on the workflows provided in FEL? Thanks, SK -- Shakthi Kannan http://www.shakthimaan.com _______________________________________________ Fedora-electronic-lab-list mailing list Fedora-electronic-lab-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-electronic-lab-list
