Hi Mark,
thanks for the answer, it took me a step further, but I still didn't succed.
Hi William,
yes please update the contributing docs.
Now to the remaining/new problems.
1/3] I think Mark's suggestion does help the build with rust, but the
case where I didn't configure --enable-rust and failed in rust land
shouldn't happen - either rust is an option and everything should work
if disabled or it has to be on and not optional.
2/3] Before receiving Marks hint about updating dependencies I had tried
to build optimized rpms, (to overcome the debug and release mismatch)
but got this strange error.
/usr/bin/mkdir -p
'/home/elkris/DEV/gh/two/389-ds-base/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210224gitbda2c53d0.fc32.x86_64/usr/lib64/dirsrv'
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c libslapd.la
libldaputil.la libns-dshttpd.la librewriters.la
'/home/elkris/DEV/gh/two/389-ds-base/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210224gitbda2c53d0.fc32.x86_64/usr/lib64/dirsrv'
libtool: error: error: cannot install 'libslapd.la' to a directory not
ending in /opt/dirsrv/lib/dirsrv
make[3]: *** [Makefile:4163: install-serverLTLIBRARIES] Error 1
3/3] When using the make command Mark provided everything seemed fin,
until it finally failed again:
/usr/bin/mkdir -p
'/home/elkris/DEV/gh/two/389-ds-base/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210224gitbda2c53d0.fc32.x86_64/usr/lib64/dirsrv'
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c libslapd.la
libldaputil.la libns-dshttpd.la librewriters.la
'/home/elkris/DEV/gh/two/389-ds-base/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210224gitbda2c53d0.fc32.x86_64/usr/lib64/dirsrv'
libtool: error: error: cannot install 'libslapd.la' to a directory not
ending in /opt/dirsrv/lib/dirsrv
make[3]: *** [Makefile:4163: install-serverLTLIBRARIES] Error 1
....
.. contents:: :depth: 2
FAIL: test_slapd
================
==2968306==ASan runtime does not come first in initial library list; you
should either link runtime to your application or manually preload it
with LD_PRELOAD.
FAIL test_slapd (exit status: 1)
+ false
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BQqMLc (%check)
Any ideas are welcome,
Best regards,
Ludwig
On 24.02.21 00:35, William Brown wrote:
Should we update the contributing/build docs to reflect these steps?
On 24 Feb 2021, at 07:10, Mark Reynolds <mreynolds@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You have to skip the npm audit check "SKIP_AUDIT_CI=1" for now, and the rust stuff is a pain and it is hardcoded to be enabled. You always have to update and download the latest Rust dependencies:
SKIP_AUDIT_CI=1 make -f rpm.mk update-cargo-dependencies download-cargo-dependencies rpms
HTH,
Mark
On 2/23/21 1:40 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
since a long time I was trying to build rpms and failed, here are the issues I run into:
1] problem with npm/audit
I followed the suggestions here: https://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/contributing.html (pushd/npm fix/popd), but this didn't help, only commenting out audit-ci in src/cockpit/389-console/node_modules.mk got me over this
2] rust
2.1]
rpm build failed with:
error: failed to get `concread` as a dependency of package `librslapd v0.1.0 (/home/elkris/DEV/gh/two/389-ds-base/rpmbuild/BUILD/389-ds-base-2.0.3.20210223gitbda2c53d0/src/librslapd)`
Caused by:
failed to load source for dependency `concread`
Caused by:
Unable to update registry `https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index`
Caused by:
failed to update replaced source registry `https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index`
Caused by:
failed to read root of directory source: /home/elkris/DEV/gh/two/389-ds-base/rpmbuild/BUILD/389-ds-base-2.0.3.20210223gitbda2c53d0/vendor
Caused by:
No such file or directory (os error 2)
make[1]: *** [Makefile:12715: .../rpmbuild/BUILD/389-ds-base-2.0.3.20210223gitbda2c53d0/rs/rslapd/release/librslapd.a] Error 101
,
It was right that there wasno rs/rslapd/release/librslapd.a file, not even the directory rs existed. After configuring --enable-rust the directory was created and populated.
Q1: why does it try to pack rust stuff if it is not enabled ?
2.2] Now the directory was there, but I still did get the same error. A closer look showed that it was looking for .../rpmbuild/BUILD/389-ds-base-2.0.3.20210223gitbda2c53d0/rs/rslapd/release/librslapd.a ,but what existed was .../rpmbuild/BUILD/389-ds-base-2.0.3.20210223gitbda2c53d0/rs/rslapd/debug/librslapd.a. Note "debug" -- "release". configure was run with --enable-debug
Q2: Is there somewhere a hardcoded/default assumpion of "release" ? in the cargo spec?
Thanks for any suggestions
Regards,
Ludwig
_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs, Australia
_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
