You have to skip the npm audit check "SKIP_AUDIT_CI=1" for now, and the
rust stuff is a pain and it is hardcoded to be enabled. You always have
to update and download the latest Rust dependencies:
SKIP_AUDIT_CI=1 make -f rpm.mk update-cargo-dependencies
download-cargo-dependencies rpms
HTH,
Mark
On 2/23/21 1:40 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
since a long time I was trying to build rpms and failed, here are the
issues I run into:
1] problem with npm/audit
I followed the suggestions here:
https://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/contributing.html (pushd/npm
fix/popd), but this didn't help, only commenting out audit-ci in
src/cockpit/389-console/node_modules.mk got me over this
2] rust
2.1]
rpm build failed with:
error: failed to get `concread` as a dependency of package `librslapd
v0.1.0
(/home/elkris/DEV/gh/two/389-ds-base/rpmbuild/BUILD/389-ds-base-2.0.3.20210223gitbda2c53d0/src/librslapd)`
Caused by:
failed to load source for dependency `concread`
Caused by:
Unable to update registry
`https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index`
Caused by:
failed to update replaced source registry
`https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index`
Caused by:
failed to read root of directory source:
/home/elkris/DEV/gh/two/389-ds-base/rpmbuild/BUILD/389-ds-base-2.0.3.20210223gitbda2c53d0/vendor
Caused by:
No such file or directory (os error 2)
make[1]: *** [Makefile:12715:
.../rpmbuild/BUILD/389-ds-base-2.0.3.20210223gitbda2c53d0/rs/rslapd/release/librslapd.a]
Error 101
,
It was right that there wasno rs/rslapd/release/librslapd.a file, not
even the directory rs existed. After configuring --enable-rust the
directory was created and populated.
Q1: why does it try to pack rust stuff if it is not enabled ?
2.2] Now the directory was there, but I still did get the same error.
A closer look showed that it was looking for
.../rpmbuild/BUILD/389-ds-base-2.0.3.20210223gitbda2c53d0/rs/rslapd/release/librslapd.a
,but what existed was
.../rpmbuild/BUILD/389-ds-base-2.0.3.20210223gitbda2c53d0/rs/rslapd/debug/librslapd.a.
Note "debug" -- "release". configure was run with --enable-debug
Q2: Is there somewhere a hardcoded/default assumpion of "release" ? in
the cargo spec?
Thanks for any suggestions
Regards,
Ludwig
_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
