On 04/01/2010 06:04 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
> Nathan Kinder wrote:
>
>> On 03/31/2010 09:02 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>
>>> Nathan Kinder wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 03/30/2010 03:44 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Nathan Kinder wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> New patch attached.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Nice!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the review!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> mep.c:491 - value is not freed if it is not a valid filter - also
>>>>> would
>>>>> be nice to have the error message print value to show what the bogus
>>>>> filter is
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I'll address this.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Do we plan on supporting binary attrs? e.g.
>>>>> mepstaticattr: blobattr:: base64value
>>>>> not sure if we care about this for the first iteration
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> This could be nice for static attributes. I'm not really sure if it
>>>> makes sense for mapped attributes or not. I'll look into how easily
>>>> this could be done, but it is something we could add later as well.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Ok. If we don't need it now, we can defer this until later.
>>>
>>>
>> I've attached a new patch that addresses the leak of the filter
>> string, prints out the bad filter in the error message, and handles
>> binary static values in the managed entry templates.
>>
> looks good - ack
>
Thanks. Pushed to master.
Counting objects: 27, done.
Delta compression using 2 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (16/16), done.
Writing objects: 100% (16/16), 18.56 KiB, done.
Total 16 (delta 10), reused 0 (delta 0)
To ssh://git.fedorahosted.org/git/389/ds.git
4b520bf..1f56658 master -> master
>> -NGK
>>
>>>> -NGK
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> -NGK
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 03/30/2010 01:24 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please hold off on the review. I noticed one other thing that I
>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>> to address. A new patch will be sent out shortly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -NGK
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 03/30/2010 01:18 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> 389-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>> 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 389-devel mailing list
>>>>>>> 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 389-devel mailing list
>>>>>> 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> 389-devel mailing list
>>>>> 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 389-devel mailing list
>>>> 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> 389-devel mailing list
>>> 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
>>>
>>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> 389-devel mailing list
>> 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
>>
> --
> 389-devel mailing list
> 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
>
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
