On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 13:35 -0700, Richard Megginson wrote: > Leroy Tennison wrote: > > > The reason I ask is that the last time I looked at it I was > > disappointed. The features seemed limited and rudimentary. You had > > to configure the context in a local file and there was no way to > > dynamically supply a different one. If there is a more robust > > alternative please let me know, I'd love to try it. If not please > > consider this an enhancement request - the greatest directory server > > in the world isn't of great value if the client support is limited. > > Thanks for any and all replies. > > I don't know of any. What are some of the features you would like to > see in pam_ldap: the next generation? From memory, SuSE has pam_unix2, which does some different things, but I'm likewise unsure what the original poster is asking for. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College http://hawkerc.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
