Leroy Tennison wrote:
The reason I ask is that the last time I looked at it I was disappointed. The features seemed limited and rudimentary. You had to configure the context in a local file and there was no way to dynamically supply a different one. If there is a more robust alternative please let me know, I'd love to try it. If not please consider this an enhancement request - the greatest directory server in the world isn't of great value if the client support is limited. Thanks for any and all replies.
I don't know of any. What are some of the features you would like to see in pam_ldap: the next generation?
-- Fedora-directory-devel mailing list Fedora-directory-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
