Sorry for breaking the thread, I wasn't subscribed on the list, so I
did not get the answer. I am now.
Reply to Petr Šabata:
> I believe most of those things should still be in the spec file
> if the 'old' option is used. Though I haven't looked at your
> code yet; maybe you did it like that...
Sorry, I did not, feel free to do so :)
> Have you possibly consulted this with Steve in any way?
> I suppose it'd be better to overtake the current project instead
> of starting a new fork...
Well, I've just forked a github repository that seems to be also a bit
modified compared to cpanspec tarball, I don't want to fork the app,
change the name and so...
I supposed Steve is on this list, is he not?
Miro Hrončok
Jabber: miro@xxxxxxxxxx
Telefon: +420777974800
2012/12/8 Miro Hrončok <miro@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi,
> I've been using cpanspec tool recently and there were several lines of
> output, that I had to change manually afterwards, that could have been
> automated.
>
> I've forked the original tool, as it seems, no one is currently working on this.
>
> Here's what I've changed:
>
> - Removed %defattr(-,root,root,-)
> - Replaced PERL_INSTALL_ROOT with DESTDIR
> - Removed BuildRoot definition
> - Removed rm -rf at the beggining of the %install section
> - Removed find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -size 0 -exec rm -f {} \;
> - Added %{?perl_default_filter} if it is not a noarch package
>
> The code is located here: https://github.com/hroncok/cpanspec
>
> I do not understand this script logic (I haven't tried so), I've just
> changed it's output a bit.
>
> Please consider using this as default in Fedora, or correct me, if
> I've done anything wrong.
>
> Miro Hrončok
>
> Jabber: miro@xxxxxxxxxx
> Telefon: +420777974800
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
