2010/7/7 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 07/07/2010 03:21 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: >> After I gained so much popularity on fedora-devel, I have no courage to >> ask rel-eng for another >> favour like "remove package, which is not mine". But surely ping >> maintainers >> to orphan/kill these packages in week or two would be nice. >> > They all are being pinged daily - All of these packages are included > inside of the broken deps reports. > >> I suppose packages, which won't be fixed, have: A/ dead upstream, B/ >> no-one is using them. Therefore I agree with removal. > Well, these packages all carry broken deps and are uninstallable in rawhide. > > I.e. unless they can be fixed, it's only a matter of whether _we_ kill > them or whether rel-eng/FTBS will kill them later. But do we have the authority (either individually, or collectively as the SIG) to arbitrarily kill off broken packages? I suspect it may be necessary to initiate the nonresponsive maintainer process. -- Iain. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
