On 07/07/2010 09:37 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > On 07/03/2010 08:06 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> An update: >> >> I filed BZ's on all of those packages which haven't not already been >> tracked as FTBS. All of these BZs are tagged as "F14Target" rsp. >> F14FTBFS (which indirectly blocks "F14Target"). >> > Thank for filing these bugzillas. Welcome. ATM, these are still open: >> * BackupPC-3.1.0-14 >> > wants perl-suidperl (Abandoned by perl-5.12.) > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611009 Fedora maintainer and upstream maintainer seem to have difficulties in understanding the issue and finding a solution. Iain has proposed a (IMHO) viable work-around, but no conclusions/results so far. >> > * perl-DBI-Dumper >> > Fails to build - Dead upstream. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555496 > FTBS, open since 2010-01-14, no response from maintainer. >> > * perl-Data-Alias >> > Fails to build - Dead upstream. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611014 >> > * perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule >> > Fails to build - Dead upstream. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015 >> > * perl-Test-AutoBuild >> > Fails to build - Dead upstream >> > (Upstream maintainer: Daniel P. Berrangé, >> > Fedora maintainer: berrange@xxxxxx ?!?) > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539046 > FTBS, open since 2009-11-19, no response from maintainer. I'd propose to close and abandon the perl-* packages rather "soonish than later" and not to wait for "Fedora 14". I.e. I'd propose to set these package's maintainers a firm deadline (say, 1-2 weeks from now) and then to kill the then remaining perl-modules. IMO, these package's maintainers and their upstreams knew about these packages issues for long enough and had sufficiently often been warned. Ralf -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
